| The authors of the review have reproduced figures from two previous publications that show the results of omega-3 dietary supplement quality assessment which has not been carried out in a correct manner. |
| These reproduced results are misinterpreted with respect to the quality requirements set by industry for dietary supplements and pharmaceutical products, because methods assessing these requirements have not been followed correctly. |
| The authors failed to cite a replication study reporting conflicting results from one of the cited studies used to substantiate their position. |
| Recent literature showing good to excellent quality of dietary supplements available to consumers has been omitted. |
Friday, 18 December 2020
Letter to the Editor Regarding Critical Differences Between Dietary Supplement and Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acids: A Narrative Review
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment