Showing posts with label Sunday Times Ireland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sunday Times Ireland. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 April 2021

Seaspiracy and the consumption of fish


 

Whether you watched Seaspiracy in horror or avoided it because you feared it would guilt you into giving up sushi, there’s no doubt that the Netflix documentary about the environmental impact of fishing has sparked a conversation, Katy McGionness writes at the Sunday times.

The film covers a lot, from the killing of whales and how sharks’ fins are sliced off to make soup while the rest is discarded, to examining bodies behind the logos on products that are meant to indicate sustainability. The film also highlights that many anti-plastic groups are funded by the fishing industry. The shocking conclusion is that the fishing industry’s impact on sea life and the oceans is so damaging that eating fish at all is unsustainable.

Is it that simple though? A number of Seaspiracy’s findings are disputed. Some experts claim they are based on outdated research while others say that the film barely touches on other important issues.

But the problem in Ireland is this: what is Ireland's problem with fish? In a comparison of fish consumption per capita in 158 countries in 2013, the Maldives ranked the highest with 166 kg followed by Iceland (90.1 kg) and Hong Kong (71 kg). Irish people consumed just 22.3 kg per capita. Fish consumption per capita in Ireland reached an all time high of 24.6 kg in 2001 and an all time low of 7.10 kg in 1961. When compared to Ireland's main peers, fish consumption per capita in Canada amounted to 22.4 kg, 34.7 kg in France, 90.1 kg in Iceland and 19.1 kg in United Kingdom in 2013. Ireland has been ranked 48th within the group of 160 countries in terms of fish consumption per capita, 4 places behind the position seen 10 years ago. 

 

Sunday, 21 March 2021

GSK and vaccine trials

    Seven vaccine trials and two trials on infant milk formula were carried out on more than 600 babies                                                                     and children;SOPA

= = = = = = 

Two months ago, we learned about 

children used as Guinea Pigs in Ireland.

In 1965, Hillary tested a measles vaccine called Glaxo Quintuple V CT21 on up to 25 infants at Bessborough and St Patrick’s. One child died of cardiac and respiratory failure two weeks after receiving the first injection. “The available medical records do not suggest this child’s death was in any way linked to the vaccine,” the report said.

The trial of another measles vaccine in 1969 was run by Victoria Coffey, a doctor who taught at Trinity College Dublin, and involved 250 children at St Patrick’s home, where she was the medical officer. She received a personal cheque for IR£230, about €5,000 in today’s money, from Glaxo “to assist with the purchase of laboratory equipment”. It was followed by a second cheque, also made payable to Coffey, for IR£250. To put the value of the payments into further context, a redbrick artisan house sold in Ringsend, Dublin 4 that year for IR£2,000.


 (...)

In November 1969, William Burland, a doctor at Glaxo’s head office in England, wrote to the company’s official in Ireland about plans for testing an experimental baby milk formula. The letter was marked “highly confidential”. “I am looking for establishments such as homes for illegitimate babies, etc where these investigations could be set up and where there are sufficient numbers to enable us to have two groups of babies, one fed with experimental milk, and one to act as controls,” it said. “Do you think it would be possible to set up a trial of this nature in Eire?”

Following a meeting between Burland and nuns at Bessborough, the trial went ahead in March 1968. The babies lined up for it had to be more than 7lb in weight. It was conducted simultaneously with trials of the same experimental milk in Malaya and Argentina.

In the Cork home, 14 children were recruited as subjects. Eithne Conlon, a GP to whom Glaxo offered a free airline flight in return for her participation, reported that the infants “experienced moderate to severe vomiting, moderate to severe wind, loose stools and green stools”. Severe vomiting, regurgitation and irritableness were noted in nine other children used for the trial at St Patrick’s. Glaxo’s L14 milk was discontinued “due to the severity of the side effects”.

 

 

Also that Doctors were paid thousands for mother and baby home trials.

Two doctors who blocked a state inquiry into vaccine trials they conducted on hundreds of children in mother and baby homes received personal cheques from the British pharmaceutical companies involved, last week’s report on the institutions shows.

Two other doctors who ran vaccine and baby-milk trials in homes in Dublin and Cork were offered money and a free flight for a holiday in England.

Patrick Meenan, a former president of the Medical Council of Ireland, and Irene Hillary, who led the National Virus Reference Laboratory in University College Dublin (UCD), made successful court challenges after being called as witnesses to the Laffoy Commission on child abuse in residential institutions. As a result, its investigation of vaccine trials for Glaxo Laboratories and the Wellcome Foundation between 1960 and 1973 was shut down by the High Court in 2004.

It has now emerged in the 3,000-page report of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes, published last Tuesday, that Meenan and Hillary received combined payments of IR£3,950 in the early 1970s, the equivalent of about €60,000 in today’s money. This was in return for conducting trials of unapproved vaccines for measles, polio, diphtheria and whooping cough. Meenan and Hillary, who were both professors of microbiology, are now dead.

The 600 children from the homes who were used in seven vaccine and two infant milk trials were mostly unaccompanied, “illegitimate” by law, had congenital conditions, or were of mixed race. Many of their mothers had psychiatric disorders, mental illness, low IQ or were under the age of consent. One mother was just 15.

The commission found the trials were conducted illegally, without medical or import licences, and without seeking the consent of the children’s mothers.

The report says the trials contravened ethical standards of the time, including the Nuremberg code, the Helsinki declaration, and British Medical Research Council guidelines.

According to the report, Meenan, who was also the head of UCD’s faculty of medicine, “appealed” to Wellcome in 1972 for a grant to employ a laboratory technician and suggested that the company give him a non-renewable grant of IR£1,650 by way of a personal cheque, which he would then endorse and make payable to the university bursar.

“He also recommended that a ‘personal grant’ of £650 be put in place [for Hillary]”, the report states. At that time, she was about to commence a trial of Wellcome’s modified three-in-one vaccine. Both payments were made by personal cheques. Meenan received a second cheque the following year for a further IR£1,650, bringing his payments to IR£3,300.

Glaxo also promised a IR£250 grant to buy laboratory equipment in return for the co-operation of Victoria Coffey, who was the medical officer for St Patrick’s mother and baby home on Dublin’s Navan Road. She asked that the payment be sent to the Medical Research Council of Ireland but it was issued directly to Coffey and made payable in her name.

Coffey wrote to Glaxo saying earlier “complications” in sourcing children for a measles trial had been surmounted. Noting the company’s “offer for financial assistance in the follow-up trial”, she said she “could easily trial at least 250 children”. Eithne Conlon, a GP and deputy medical officer for the Bessborough mother and baby home in Cork, was offered a free air fare for a holiday in England “as reimbursement” when she agreed to test baby milk in the home. The report does not state if she accepted it.

The commission found no evidence that any child was harmed by the trials, but its report chronicles episodes of vomiting and “green diarrhoea” in some children after being vaccinated.

Both Wellcome and Glaxo were subsumed into the pharmaceutical multinational GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in 2000. The company has refused to say whether it will contribute to any redress scheme for survivors of the institutions.

It said last week: “GSK understand that practices described in the report make for difficult reading and our thoughts are with the families involved. The report does not reflect how clinical studies are conducted today. In today’s clinical studies, participants or their parents/guardians must give their informed consent to participate after being told about the study, its potential benefits and its potential risks. Withdrawal from a clinical study remains the right of all participants.

“Given the lapse of time, GSK is unable to provide any further comment on the historic events outlined in the report and its conclusions.”

About 9,000 of the 57,000 babies born in the 18 homes investigated died. In the 1930s and 1940s, 40% of babies in the institutions died before their first birthdays.

Some 56,000 women were incarcerated, 5,616 of them under 18.

= = =

Today, on the Sunday Times, we can read that

Children's minister urges GSK to compensate vaccine trial victims

Roderic O’Gorman, the minister for children, has asked GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the pharmaceutical firm, to consider making “reparations” to the former residents of mother and baby homes where vaccine trials were conducted in the Sixties and Seventies.

Last week O’Gorman wrote to Dame Emma Walmsley, GSK’s chief executive in Britain, seeking “appropriate action” to meet the company’s moral and ethical responsibility, after further detail about the trials emerged in the final report of the commission of investigation into mother and baby homes in January.

The commission, chaired by Judge Yvonne Murphy, said seven vaccine trials and two trials on infant milk formula were carried out on more than 600 babies and children in the homes, between 1960 and 1973, on behalf of Glaxo Laboratories and the Wellcome Foundation. These companies later became part of the GSK group.

 

 

Tuesday, 5 May 2020

Letter to the Editor, Sunday Times, 3.5.2020


Sunday Times, 3rd May 2020


Must try harder
With Covid-19 having closed schools and universities, there is an opportunity to rethink our teaching practices. Since March 13, my children have waited every morning for a boring email on the Teams app with more homework. Would it really be so hard to have a Teams online class at least once a week, in order to keep spirits up?

Sending out emails is not education, is it? We should be asking what we need to modify in order to move to online teaching and assessment. For example, can we deliver lab practicals online?
Exams where students have to recite word for word are not promoting meritocracy. We need people who can think, analyse, synthesise; not just memorise information that is only two clicks away.
With a plethora of e-resources and online educational tools, we should be thinking beyond conventional exams and predictive marking.
Ioannis Zabetakis, lecturer, University of Limerick

Monday, 24 September 2018

the (not) definitive Schools Guide in Ireland and the Animal School

the book of Leo Buscaglia where the story of The Animal School was published.


 The news

"Laurel Hill Coláiste FCJ, Limerick is the top secondary school in Ireland for a record fifth successive year, the Sunday Times Best Schools Guide 2018 has revealed. 96.4% of the girls progress to university from the Gaelcholáiste, the Sunday Times reports. The annual Sunday Times survey is the definitive guide to the country’s top 400 secondary schools. It measures the progression of all second-level students over a three-year period – from 2015 to 2017 – to universities and institutes of technology".

How the guide was compiled
The progression of students to third-level study from all 714 state-funded secondary schools in the Republic of Ireland was examined. Data were collected from 27 3rd level Institutions in the Republic and two in NI.

The only criterion used for this guide is the "average proportion of pupils gaining places in autumn 2015, 2016 and 2017 at one of the nine universities on the island if Ireland, main teacher training colleges, Royal College of Surgeons or National College of Art and Design" (according to the Sunday Times, Ireland, 23/9/2018).

Parameters like the variety of extra-curriculum activities, the number of foreign languages, sport and civic achievements have not been used as ranking criteria.

The monolithic approach in constructing this (not) definitive schools guide brings to mind the case of  The Animal School — a story of Leo Buscaglia, as published in his book "Living, Loving and Learning".

In Leo's school, the animals got together in the forest one day and decided to start a school. 

(exact extract from the book)

"There was a rabbit, a bird, a squirrel, a fish and an eel, and they formed a Board of Education.

The rabbit insisted that running be in the curriculum.

The bird insisted that flying be in the curriculum.

The fish insisted that swimming be in the curriculum, and the squirrel insisted that perpendicular tree climbing be in the curriculum.

They put all of these things together and wrote a Curriculum Guide.

Then they insisted that all of the animals take all of the subjects.

Although the rabbit was getting an A in running perpendicular tree climbing was a real problem for him; he kept falling over backwards.

Pretty soon he got to be sort of brain damaged, and he couldn’t run any more. He found that instead of making an A in running, he was making a C and, of course, he always made an F in perpendicular tree climbing.

The bird was really beautiful at flying, but when it came to burrowing in the ground, he couldn’t do so well.

He kept breaking his beak and wings.

Pretty soon he was making a C in flying as well as an F in burrowing, and he had a hell of a time with perpendicular tree climbing.

The moral of the story is that the animal who was valedictorian of the class was a mentally retarded eel who did everything in a halfway fashion.

But the educators were all happy because everybody was taking all of the subjects, and it was called a broad-based education".


Dr Ioannis Zabetakis (MRSC, MEd)